🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a proposed legislation that include decreasing the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials issued a warning that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “according to global guideline limits”, delayed for at least twelve months after the law is enacted.

International experts actually suggests a warning should cover at least half of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, claiming that it would drive users to “black market” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

In the letter, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but asserts that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We live in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my garden and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator commented: “The corporation runs its operations according with applicable local laws. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which provide for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, noting that minors should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to achieve intended population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.